There are at least 5 things wrong with this image.
Can you spot all of them all?
When it comes to spreading ideas, the internet can be a blessing and a curse.
While it allows knowledge to be exchanged across borders, to billions of people and at the speed of light, the question also arises as to whether that information can be trusted.
There are thousands of people online who take great care in only showcasing information which has evidence to back it up. For example, the army of fact-checkers who keep Wikipedia accurate, hard-working journalists or scientific journals which are no longer limited by access to university libraries or subscriptions.
This is why you will always see my link directly to my sources when I write my articles about innovation and creativity. Evidence is of the upmost importance for you to trust what I write.
But unfortunately it is just as easy for anyone to make any claim they want, without any evidence to back it up. In some cases, lies and inaccurate information actually can be more appealing for certain people because it causes an emotional reaction rather than a rational one, allowing fake information to spread as it is shared between people
And as a result, misinformation like anti-vaccine rumours can spread quickly over the internet.
Especially if it is designed in a “share-first, think later” format like the image above.
So when you come across new ideas online, ask yourself three things:
- Does this information have a credible source?
- How does that source compare to other evidence from the scientific or journalistic community?
- Who would benefit from sharing misinformation?
Stay safe online.
Latest posts by Nick Skillicorn (see all)
- How music streaming has transformed songwriting - July 26, 2021
- Podcast S5E125: Ben Hunt-Davis – Perform like an Olympic Gold Medallist - July 22, 2021
- The Ambiguity Effect bias - July 21, 2021
- Disruption is not a strategy - July 20, 2021